William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
ANOTHER OPENING, ANOTHER SHOW – AT 6:44 P.M. ET: Justice John Paul Stevens, who tilts to the liberal side of the Supreme Court, has given a public hint as to his retirement plans:
COMMENT: Some will say that a Stevens retirement, followed by an Obama anointment, will not change the Court's ideological balance. Not necessarily true. There are liberals, and then there are super-liberals. Stevens is a liberal voice, but he's hardly a flamethrower. My own sense is that Obama, who only needs a majority in the Senate to push through a nominee, dreams of a real ideologist on the bench. Some of his lower-court appointments have been disturbing. Of course, if the GOP takes over the Senate in November – a long shot – all will be different. Even if it doesn't, the tiny number of Democratic moderates who are left could block an extreme appointment, although the term "Democratic moderate" now seems like a contradiction-in-terms, given how most of that crowd caved during the health-care fight. I'd expect another minority-group appointment, possibly an African-American, who would provide leftist balance to Clarence Thomas, whose existence as a human being the left barely recognizes. April 3, 2010 |
|